Producing for me is an adventure.
Report
Hakan Sorar
What if you had a superpower?
I don't know what would happen, but I wish I could dominate time.
Is there a sentence, a thought that always wanders in your mind these days?
I have been thinking about the word “ambiguity .. for a long time.
Day dreams or night dreams?
Post -noon and evening dreams
What's the time with timeL?
While thinking about time, I often feel like you can't catch the flow. I can say that I just started to define time and experience it differently.
At a time when the images are produced so fast, their meanings are permanent.Lhow to yourself in the uncertaintyL do you create production and experimental fields?
Producing for me is an adventure. I do not put forward everything I produce as a finished work. I see it as stops, trials and tests that I have visited and visited. At this point, my experiences and what needs to be transferred to the future. It may be necessary to run after the new while creating them. Although the subject of my work remains the same, the technique has changed and transforms by spreading aesthetics to time. It is developing rapidly with the vehicle. In order to adapt to this, you need a process and discipline to follow updates. I think my general answer to this question as a letter, memory or daily writing. At that moment, in that way, something produced with emotions will exist as a document in the future. Five of the same intensity of the emotions while writingL Then I think the transformation is about change. I think the strainer here, how much to transfer.
How the anonymity of the bodies in his works on the gender axisL are you positioning? Could it be a method of increasing ambiguity, increasing images, expanding normative values?
I do not use a surrogate in my production, I want to break the representation. I am excited by the situation of ambiguity. In the center of all my productions, there is a secret secret. Leaving it in the middle, leaving it to the audience, saying something, but not saying anything, not to say anything, productions away from bilateral systems, certain things excite me. Studies that try to overcome duality, do not represent anything, and have different referring within themselves. A ki that spilled from the bodyL There are things that the grain is disgusting to human beings about norms and gender. The anonymity of the works question a lot of things in this state of being in the middle, and it emerges with this anonymity how much a nail polish says about gender.
What does all this say about the body? What do my experiences say to me? The basis of my production on the body develops with these questions. What is norm? Where are we? I want my production to represent one age, ethnic group, gender, or as if it were representing it, let it be ambiguous.
How to make artificial intelligence for your own production area to make a collective reading of normsL are you instrumentalized?
My journey Photography with a physical camera. Then the virtual camera excited me much more. Now the potential and possibility of artificial intelligence excites me and inspires me. I look at artificial intelligence as a tool, a accompanying and a friend and an assistant who can give an idea. In artificial intelligence, most of the means of image production also have censorship mechanisms. For example, when Dalle-2 developed by OpenAI, Queer could not be written when it first appeared, and when Queer was written, it was warning. Whatever we are, artificial intelligence is a little bit. Due to the data he uses, he can be racist, sexist approaches can come out. While experimenting with artificial intelligence, we experiment with collective accumulation. When a human being uploaded to the system, he describes it as a man or man when he asks him to define the image. Since we define the world with bilateral norms, artificial intelligence is also mirroring. I'm trying to do experiments that exceed the limits of these duality.
History is an area that is controlled and shaped by various power mechanisms, such as the body. Archeology, how for your workL Create contexts?
Archeology can sometimes be an area that is considered to be the past with today's eye. In this discipline, some ambiguous findings can be shaped by ideas and solidify. However, there are studies that open up the archeology from a feminist and kuir perspective. A figurine in Aşıklı Höyük, where I had the chance to work in the “Excavation Traces” exhibition, which I was part of before, can be an example of this. 30LDuring the excavation process, there are very few figurine in Aşıklı Höyük. Nothing can be said about the gender of this figure, which looks like a chest, with a relief on the upper part and a relief that can depict the penis under the body. Perhaps there are no different figurines to be sampled. On this figurine, the President of Aşıklı Höyük Excavation. Dr. Mihriban Özbaşaran's “big questions of small clay figures” headLHe has a valuable article. Archaeologist Sera Yeler, who finds this figure, has valuable works on gender in the Neolithic period through the grave beads in Aşıklı Höyük. "Why is gender studies late in the archeology of Türkiye?" Yelzer, who works on the question, is very excited. Archaeologists who have opened up to all possibilities by not speaking clearly give me inspiration.
When there is an object of the body in excavations, it can be defined through dual gender patterns. A sufficient data set is perceived as non -existent data about intersexes, for example, and the data on women and children are perceived as biased in some readings. Of course, this is the field of archeology and science. In this field, only as artistsLWhen interpreting non -period data, we can underline examples and possibilities within the framework of logic.
Based on this ambiguous area in Aşıklı Höyük, we worked with the figurines we created with Ahmet Rüstem and further ambiguity. Figurines that we create, seem to be solid and constant; When they were experienced with augmented reality, they were constantly changing and transforming into figurines that transformed their body without stopping and transcending their molds. On the other hand, it is very normal to break the archaeological findings from their own fields and to be exhibited in other museums and countries.L It was also referring to the question of democratization with its accessibility.
How else with Ahmet RüstemL Have you worked?
While we continue my career with my individual productions, we produce DUO works with Ahmet Rüstem. It is very enjoyable to produce together, we feed more than each other.
We produced an experience called “Theatrum Mundi ile with Ahmet Rüstem for the group exhibition at Crete Contemporary Art Space in Baku. This work, which removed the audience from a passive situation and transformed it into a manufacturer, turned into an interactive experience using the Unreal Engine game engine with the support of Engin Arer.
In December, we will meet the audience hosted by Bilsart & Monoco IO with our Duo exhibition called “Rest in Pieces ğı, which we have been preparing for a long time. In this exhibition, our focus will be the relationship between body, archeology, gender and architecture. For this exhibition, Kütahya Tavşanlı Höyük excavations. Dr. We worked with Erkan Fidan. Who do we experience the remnants of this series that we create by pursuing an archaeological finds focus on everyday objects? shaped with questions such as.
Photography: Batu Tate
Video: Batu Tate
Interview: my story Pala
Page Design Application: Çağrı Ambition and Ünal Baş
Page Design: Studio stamp